Möchten Sie zur deutschen Seite wechseln?JaNeina
关闭
Smart Automotive Insights image

受众评估与洞察

现在的顾客比以前享有更多的媒体内容、渠道和更多的设备选择。

广告人、媒体所有者和媒体广告投放者需要确定哪些数字和传统渠道最能成功吸引目标受众。

我们的受众评估解决方案是针对电视 (例如电视收视率)、平面、广播、户外、网上和移动媒体的评估工具。我们跟踪哪些顾客使用哪种渠道,他们如何受到每种媒介的内容吸引,以及什么推动他们的行为。

有了这些关于顾客内容鉴赏的详细观点,我们的客户不仅能够获悉人们的收视率或收听率,而且能够了解收视率或收听率高低的原因。我们的跨媒体评估显示对于每种渠道和内容类型,受众使用什么设备,我们还评估您在所有渠道范围内的营销效率和绩效。

我们帮助您优化渠道选择和内容,提高终端对受众的吸引力。

研究洞察

Here you can find the latest Media Measurement insights. View all insights

    • 08/22/17
    • Media and Entertainment
    • Media Measurement
    • Global
    • English

    A new wrinkle in over-the-top TV services: vMVPDs not so virtual anymore

    In the ever-changing world of delivering video to TVs and homes, real bellwether moments can sometimes slip by us. But the appearance on the scene of the awkwardly named vMVPDs (virtual multichannel video programming distributors) could well be such a moment.  These “skinny bundle” services offer a variety of broadcast and cable networks via on-demand streaming — and at least some channels are available to stream “live” when broadcast. The potential of this new OTT wrinkle is huge. Delivering live programming and events as they happen has been a key differentiator for traditional pay TV services as they try to fend off streaming service providers. Now, services like DirecTV NOW, Sling TV, and PlayStation Vue can begin to offer competing live programming – the opening of a potential floodgate in video media.

    Innovation worth watching

    We measured vMVPDs for the first time this year in our long-running The Home Technology Monitor™. The new Ownership and Trend Report shows that 3% of TV homes subscribe to one of the vMVPDs listed above. (It was too early to measure either Hulu with Live TV or YouTube TV). Now, three percent may seem like a “blip” if there ever was one – but every real innovation has to start somewhere. And this one in the media industry has definitely found to be worth watching. That is why we decided to collect additional information on vMVPD homes — but, as there were only 82 of them, consider the following to be directional findings, not definitive. Looking at those homes which report DirecTV NOW, Sling TV or Playstation Vue subscriptions, we find very similar levels of adoption among the three – there is not a dominant player at this point in time by any means.

    Who is subscribing to vMVPD services?

    Perhaps most interesting is where these vMVPD homes came from, in terms of reception. A small minority – just one in six – of these homes were “uncorded” before subscribing to their vMVPD service. Half cancelled regular pay TV service. And almost exactly one-third report they also have “regular” pay TV service.  And all report having a TV set and almost all say they stream to a TV set in some manner. Thus the vMVPD home is far from the cord-cutting, TV-less home some may have expected. However, if one counts vMVPD homes in the same bucket as “pay TV” – something on which there was not a consensus from our Home Technology Monitor subscribers – then the pay TV home decrease is offset, and its level holds relatively steady compared with last year. This is a definite silver lining in these difficult days for cable networks, if not their traditional MVPD partners.

    An improved user experience for viewers?

    vMVPDs with live TV will likely remain a hot topic in 2017,  as additional competitors join in — whether streaming-first brands (Hulu and YouTube) or, as rumored, traditional MVPD services. These services are banking on consumers accepting a smaller selection of networks and the promise of an improved viewer user experience compared with traditional providers. While vMVPDs will certainly be of interest to a sizable viewer niche, expansion outside the obvious Cord Cutters/Cord Never targets will require a high level of consumer satisfaction and the ability to deliver desired content. People may have many complaints about their interactions with their cable providers and their costs, the actual delivery of television to the home by pay TV tends to be very reliable – which can’t always be said for video streaming. We also see many local TV markets are still unserved by the new “live TV” streaming from broadcast networks because of affiliate agreements – the network O&Os are available, but availability outside of those markets is still sparse. But these are still early days, and several more years will likely be needed to accurately assess the long-term traction of vMVPD-type services. With several notable players all in on vMVPDs (Hulu, YouTube, AT&T, DISH and Sony) and several notables sitting it out (Amazon, Apple), it will certainly make for an interesting period for researchers, competitors and consumers. Get similar insights – and many more – as soon as they get published by subscribing to The Home Technology Monitor in 2017. Aside from our annual Ownership and Trend Report, our report topics this year include Commanding Media (voice commands), Over-the-Top TV, TV Everywhere and SVOD Digital Purchase Journey. hbspt.cta.load(2405078, '9e81766d-3de3-4a41-b18f-755b81cf461d', {});
    • 07/31/17
    • Media and Entertainment
    • Media Measurement
    • Global
    • English

    How Cord Nevers and Cord Cutters compare in their TV viewing preferences

    The rise in streaming television viewing in the US continues apace with the frequent arrival of new “skinny bundles” of programming. But if you think there’s no difference between TV Cord Cutters—defined as viewers who eliminated their standard TV subscription—and Cord Nevers (people who have never paid for a traditional TV connection) think again. While Cord Cutters have some things in common with Cord Nevers, they differ in many ways. Additionally, neither group has ruled out opting for a traditional pay TV service in the future, as their satisfaction with their current TV access situation leaves much room for improvement.

    Netflix is front and center

    First the similarities, as highlighted by the latest GfK MRI Cord Evolution study, which tracks the attitudes and behaviors of 10,000 respondents nationwide. Both Cord Cutters and Cord Nevers are big fans of shows on Netflix. All 10 of the favorite streaming-only shows of Cutters are on Netflix compared to seven shows preferred by Cord Nevers, whose other three shows are on Amazon or Hulu. The Netflix original “Orange Is The New Black” is #1 for both groups. When it comes to platform choices, differences emerge. Netflix is the top streaming service among Cord Cutters, with 57% of respondents saying they have used the service in the past year. 50% said they had used YouTube and 37% Amazon. But Cord Nevers prefer YouTube (46%), followed by Netflix (39%) and Amazon (25%).

    Video habits

    Cord Nevers are heavy short-video viewers and they over index for over-the-top services like BBC News, Showtime and Vevo. Conversely, Cord Cutters are heavy Internet users and are more likely to be parents (35%, index of 112). They also over-index for OTT services like PBS Video, Disney Movies, Sling TV and A&E. Semantical differences emerge when respondents are asked to define “TV” and old habits have a way of enduring. Large percentages of Cord Nevers (43%) and Cord Cutters (50%) define TV as anything they can watch specifically on a TV set. Some of this can perhaps be attributed to the rise in connected-TV devices and a migration from mobile video viewing back to a big screen, particularly at night, in the living room. Both groups are equal (29%) in saying that TV is “anything they can view on any device” (including a smartphone or tablet).

    Leaving their options open

    With so many streaming choices available, one could assume that Cord Nevers and Cord Cutters would be pretty satisfied. But that’s not the case. The data show that 60% of Cord Nevers are “very satisfied” with their current TV access, compared to 50% of Cord Cutters. Meanwhile, almost one-quarter (22%) of Cord Nevers say they intend to subscribe to a traditional TV service in the next six months, a figure that is slightly higher (27%) among Millennial Cord Nevers.

    Conclusion

    Cord Nevers and Cord Cutters bring very different histories and expectations to viewing. Both groups still have strong allegiance to TV sets and traditional programming models, but they clearly have different viewing tastes, and even diverge on their perceptions of what TV actually is. As Millennials get older, we can look for these populations to transform and perhaps grow more similar while Gen Z will begin to shape the Cord Never group more and more.
    hbspt.cta.load(2405078, '2e1e01ce-1108-418f-a3d0-96a47f22fb5a', {});
    • 07/28/17
    • Media and Entertainment
    • Media Measurement
    • Global
    • English

    Why a 360° crossmedia view is vital to bridging the gap between content and consumers

    Connected Consumers face an avalanche of communications on a daily basis. Advances in connectivity, coupled with societal shifts, mean that we live in an age where media is “always on” – for both advertisers and consumers. This culture of relentless connectivity is one that causes friction between audiences and content. Although consumers understand that advertising is required to pay for content, they do not want to be bombarded indiscriminately with sales messages. The challenge is to bridge the gap between consumers and content. To achieve this, marketers and advertisers need to create powerful media strategies with a 360° view of their digital audience.

    Activate your segmentation for marketing purposes

    Your objective should be to understand the importance of each online channel in the overall media context, and how this varies by device. By monitoring the online behavior of specific consumer groups, based on your existing segmentation, you can optimize your media planning. For instance, you can track activity by media and device, and isolate that by individual target groups based on demographics and psychographics. You can also trace online and offline purchase behavior and media usage. These sophisticated profiles will enable you to identify the most impactful ad spaces to optimize targeting, enabling you to reach and influence your target group’s decision-making, whether in the offline world or in a programmatic environment.

    Assess and improve the performance of your multi-channel campaigns

    From TV spot, paid social, online placement to print and out-of-home, you need to understand how your campaign performs across channels and devices. When planning a new campaign, it is vital to assess net and incremental reach and target attainment so that you know that your next campaign has the elements it needs to succeed. Once you have a reliable crossmedia perspective on all your touchpoints, you can ensure that future campaigns have the right ingredients. For example, a thorough crossmedia assessment will enable you to identify the optimal media mix to maximize your sales opportunities. If you are the owner of digital inventory you need to understand which campaign channels have driven incremental traffic to your website or app. To do so, you need to input the variable of page impressions by users exposed to your campaign in your marketing mix modeling.

    Bridging the gap

    Bridging the gap between Connected Consumers and content is a key priority for advertisers today. Solutions based on single source measurement, combining passive behavioral and attitudinal data with socio-demographics, will provide you with the much needed 360° view on your target groups. To share your thoughts, please email ondrej.szabo@gfk.com.  hbspt.cta.load(2405078, 'c4cd5ae1-6d3a-4e8e-9954-3b4a376eb7ff', {});
    • 07/27/17
    • Media and Entertainment
    • Media Measurement
    • Global
    • English

    Does mobile engagement ring true? The need for a total media perspective

    I always like people-watching on my morning commute on the train. Not in a weird way you understand. There are people sleeping, reading, watching and listening. But nobody talks. There are several people staring vacantly into their mobile phones, scrolling and clicking. The man opposite me reads his free morning newspaper. Another is working and listening to music on his earphones. A woman watches a TV programme on her tablet. While Zenith predicts there will be a 35% increase in viewing on mobile devices (smartphones and tablets) to 28.8 minutes a day, I wonder how engaged these people really are in what they are doing. Furthermore, I wonder how one can compare those differing levels of engagement, however great or small, across the various media being consumed on the 55 minute train ride.

    How to compare mobile engagement

    It is the mobile engagement that intrigues me. I have seen it defined as the level of interaction between a brand and consumer via a mobile device. The more frequent the interactions, the higher the engagement. Apparently, people check their mobile phones 150 times a day. How should we compare multiple, short duration activities on a mobile with single, long duration activities, such as watching TV or listening to the radio? Advertising spend for mobile is forecast to have a 37% share of all media ad spend by 2021 (eMarketer). Yet there exists no uniform measure of digital ad effectiveness. Some work has been done a while ago that claims a link exists between exposure time and CTR/CPA performance. But cases have also been reported of networks buying traffic to sites and having between 75% and 95% of hits coming from bots, or non-human traffic, which opens up the thorny issue of click fraud and unverified data; or as I call it, the Internet of Sins.

    Is duration a valid online metric?

    I question the value of using duration in online metrics. Even a cursory observation of the smartphone users on my commute and one can argue that is the perfect definition of non-human traffic! Ironically, these are the same people who are so engaged when reading their smartphone screens walking through the city streets that they bump into several people coming the other way. I swear I saw one walk right into a digital outdoor advertising screen. They literally could not see an advert if it hit them in the face!

    Providing a ‘total media’ perspective

    Measuring the impact of mobile cannot be done in isolation. More advanced media measurement techniques are required to support a deeper understanding of the continually evolving media landscape. Our measurement philosophy is to provide a ‘total media’ perspective through smartly integrating media and consumer data on our Media Measurement platform. In this way, we can really see how mobile is performing alongside other media.

    Mobile engagement rings true in combination with other media

    For example, where measuring mobile engagement can work is for radio. For me, it is a chance to continue listening from the breakfast table through to the office desk, varying 3G/4G quality and tube travel notwithstanding. RAJAR reports that 25% of UK adults listen to the radio via mobile phone or tablet at least once a month (RAJAR Q1 2017), and 9 million listen through their earphones. It is a personal device made for a personal medium for a personal relationship. As the late BBC radio breakfast broadcaster, Terry Wogan, replied when asked how many listeners he had: “Only one.” John Carroll is Global Director, Business Development, Media Measurement at GfK. He can be reached at john.carroll@gfk.com or followed on Twitter @MediaCarroll.
GfK研究人员
Jessica Liu, 刘荣
+86 10 59053322
General